Attack first. Defend better.
Attackers don't read your policy documents — they probe your applications, networks, and people until something gives. Our offensive team does the same, on your side, before the real adversary does.
Think like an attacker. Protect what matters.
Certified offensive specialists (OSCP, OSCP+, OSCE, OSWE, OSWP, CREST CRT) with a track record across fintech, blockchain, government, and enterprise environments — delivering a clear, prioritized picture of your real-world risk and a practical path to fixing it.
White-box depth
With source code access we reach the paths black-box testing never touches — the error branch that skips the authorization check, the admin function nothing links to.
Detection-informed method
Our methodology is shaped by defending real environments, so we know which techniques actually evade EDR and SOC tooling — and which just trip every alert.
Researchers, not button-pushers
Our operators hold OSCP, OSCE, OSWE, OSWP, and CREST CRT, and do original research rather than running someone else's playbook.
Reporting both audiences can use
An executive summary your board can act on and a technical report your engineers can fix from — in the same deliverable, not two disconnected documents.
Remediation for your architecture
Fix guidance written against the stack you actually run, not generic advice copied out of a standard.
Right-sized engagements
Scoped honestly from startup to enterprise. We would rather test three things properly than twelve superficially.
Offensive security services.
A comprehensive breakdown of modern offensive security testing — from full-scope adversary simulation to targeted application and infrastructure assessments.
Offensive Infrastructure
Adversary simulation and application-layer testing against the surfaces users touch.
Platform & Infrastructure Testing
The cloud accounts, networks, and directory services everything else sits on.
Specialized & Emerging Technology
The systems generic testing shops decline: on-chain, desktop binaries, industrial control.
Assessment & Code Analysis
Looking at the source and the whole estate, not just what's reachable from outside.
Managed & Continuous Security
Ongoing programs rather than point-in-time engagements — monitoring and secure delivery.
Not sure where to start?
Talk to our security engineers. We'll help you scope the right test — red team, penetration test, or code review — based on your infrastructure, stack, and compliance needs.
Structured methodology.
Every engagement follows a structured, industry-standard methodology so results are consistent, defensible, and easy to act on. Web application testing is aligned to the OWASP Top 10 (2021), and all findings are scored using CVSS v4.0.
- 01
Scoping
Agree targets, objectives, testing windows, and rules of engagement in writing — including what stays explicitly out of scope.
- 02
Recon & mapping
Build a complete picture of the attack surface through passive intelligence gathering and careful active discovery.
- 03
Exploitation
Prove each weakness is real by exploiting it, rather than reporting a theoretical risk off a version number.
- 04
Post-exploitation
Establish what an attacker reaches from that foothold — lateral movement, escalation, and the data actually at risk.
- 05
Reporting
Executive summary, technical detail, full attack narrative, and prioritized remediation targeting root causes.
- 06
Retest
Once your team has deployed fixes, we re-test the findings to confirm each one is genuinely closed.
Testing approaches
| Approach | Access level | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Black box | Zero knowledge — no credentials or internal access. | Simulating an external attacker discovering vulnerabilities from scratch. |
| Grey box | Partial knowledge — a standard user account or API documentation. | Modelling an insider threat, or post-breach behaviour against authenticated functionality. |
| White box | Full access to source code, architecture, and design. | Uncovering deeply hidden code-level and architectural flaws. |
Risk rating — CVSS v4.0
| Severity | CVSS score | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 9.0 – 10.0 | Easily exploited with catastrophic impact; must be fixed immediately. |
| High | 7.0 – 8.9 | Serious weakness with major potential impact; fix with high priority. |
| Medium | 4.0 – 6.9 | Meaningful impact under specific conditions; should be remediated. |
| Low | 0.1 – 3.9 | Limited impact; lower priority. |
| Informative | 0.0 | Best-practice recommendations and hardening opportunities. |
Reporting you can act on.
Every engagement concludes with an executive summary of business risk, a severity breakdown of all findings, step-by-step reproduction and evidence for each issue, and concrete remediation guidance.
Findings tracked through
So progress is transparent from first draft to final retest.
Manual expertise paired with
What an engagement actually costs you in time.
Indicative sizing so you can locate yourself before a scoping call. Final scope always follows the conversation, not a price list.
Small
~1 weekTargeted testing of a specific feature, a small web app, or a small external footprint.
Medium
2 – 4 weeksA standard deep-dive web app assessment, or internal Active Directory / complex network testing.
Large
~8 weeksFull-scale red team operations or complex white-box testing.
Web & Mobile Application Testing
| Application profile | Team | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Small / simplee.g. static marketing site with 1–2 forms | 1 tester | 3 – 5 days |
| Medium / standarde.g. SaaS platform with user roles, dashboards, APIs | 1 – 2 testers | 2 weeks |
| Large / enterprisee.g. banking portals, complex ERPs with microservices | 2 testers | 3 – 4 weeks |
Infrastructure & Network Testing
| Scope | Team | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Internal network (up to 250 IPs) | 1 tester | 1 – 2 weeks |
| External network (up to 50 IPs) | 1 tester | 3 – 5 days |
| Full Active Directory auditGPOs, Kerberos, privilege escalation | 1 – 2 testers | 2 weeks |
Red Team Operations
| Scenario | Team | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Standard simulationinitial access → lateral movement → objective | 2 – 3 testers | 4 – 8 weeks |
| Assumed compromisestart from an internal workstation | 2 testers | 2 – 3 weeks |
Reverse Engineering & Binary Analysis
| Focus | Team | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Firmware / IoT analysis | 1 tester | 2 – 4 weeks |
| Malware analysis / deep protocol reversing | 1 tester | 1 – 2 weeks per sample |
Ready to go on the offensive?
Book a free, no-obligation scoping call. Tell us what you're building and what keeps you up at night — we'll recommend the right engagement and return a tailored scope and timeline.